American Apparel Assless Stockings

Love It or Leave It? American Apparel's Cut-Out Stockings


Updated May 23 2009 - 11:49am · Posted by · 34 comments

What I mean to say is, ass-less stockings. The lovely Sasha Grey models these "sheer luxe cut-out panty hose," which are coming soon to American Apparel. I'm still trying to figure out if they have a utilitarian ass-pect, or if they're strictly for show.

Source

Receive email alerts on:

Love It Or Leave It
American Apparel

34 Comments - Post a Comment

not knowing what these are for. I am guessing that becuase when you wear pantyhose you have flat a$$ and having your hiney free makes it more shapely
- 4 years ago Report Comment
why would I possibly need my a$$ hanging out. Why would I need to buy stockings with my a$$ hanging out
- 4 years ago Report Comment
What's up with her butt? So weird in the NSFW version.
- 4 years ago Report Comment
For those days when you can't decide if you want to wear pantyhose or not. You can sort of half wear it.
Actually, I think it's a good idea... pantyhose and tights tend to flatten by butt.
- 4 years ago Report Comment
Gross!
- 4 years ago Report Comment
Gross!
It'd be fine if you were wearing a thong or a G if it helps keep shape. I worry that the hose would shift and I'd end up with some half-assed look. Literally and figuratively.
- 4 years ago Report Comment
I hate stockings period.
- 4 years ago Report Comment
I hate stockings period.
- 4 years ago Report Comment
i'm glad some of you on here were able to come up with one good reason for these - to keep your butt looking plump not flat - i'm impressed and thankful, but i'd still never buy them or wear them! how uncomfy!
- 4 years ago Report Comment
imagine when you are slowly undressing in front of your partner. all of a sudden your flaws are highlighted by these stockings
- 4 years ago Report Comment
I guess they'd be good if you didn't wear underwear and really had to go #2. Sorry, couldn't resist.
- 4 years ago Report Comment
I'm sorry but if they make a MODEL's a$$ look huge and sort of floppy I can't (or don't want to) imagine what they do for a regular person!
- 4 years ago Report Comment
I have no opinion, as I don't wear stockings. I think stockings should be illegal. They're practically torture devices.
- 4 years ago Report Comment
Referring to the NSFW pict on actual site...
I'm obviously a minority but i'd wear them. I've read wearing tight materials on your butt causes cellulite and I wear tights and stocking ALOT so this would be a great help to me.
- 4 years ago Report Comment
Not sexy, not useful... I don't get it at all !!
- 4 years ago Report Comment
This is just STUPID all-around in every aspect of the design. I saw the NSFW pics, and it's a thong with your cheeks sticking out. They're not going to raise your butt any higher, in fact your butt will probably sag with gravity. The top is somewhat fortified, but it's only enough to not let your thighs, hips and stomach breathe. And they're not cute. Why????!!!
- 4 years ago Report Comment
This is just STUPID all-around in every aspect of the design. I saw the NSFW pics, and it's a thong with your cheeks sticking out. They're not going to raise your butt any higher, in fact your butt will probably sag with gravity. The top is somewhat fortified, but it's only enough to not let your thighs, hips and stomach breathe. And they're not cute. Why????!!!
- 4 years ago Report Comment
Ugly. If I wanted my body to breathe more, I'd wear a garter belt with thigh highs, which is both sexy and comfy.
- 4 years ago Report Comment
At first I didn't realize they are like a thong and thought they were just sort of open on the ass. That would at least be useful for quickies without having to take off your skirt or pantyhose. But now that I see the thong part, I am confused.
- 4 years ago Report Comment
For those of you who haven't seen the uncensored pics, the stockings aren't completely buttless, they're more, cheekless. The stockings are similar to a g-string, there's a bit of stocking that goes along/between the butt cheeks, with the cheeks left exposed. And Grey is a porn star, she's only tiny and doesn't seem to weigh much and even her butt looked big in those stockings in the uncensored pics. If you go to the AA site you can see the pictures uncensored. Personally I think they look uncomfortable and I can imagine them cutting into your skin.
- 4 years ago Report Comment
For those of you who haven't seen the uncensored pics, the stockings aren't completely buttless, they're more, cheekless. The stockings are similar to a g-string, there's a bit of stocking that goes along/between the butt cheeks, with the cheeks left exposed.And Grey is a porn star, she's only tiny and doesn't seem to weigh much and even her butt looked big in those stockings in the uncensored pics. If you go to the AA site you can see the pictures uncensored.Personally I think they look uncomfortable and I can imagine them cutting into your skin.
- 4 years ago Report Comment
Tacky.
- 4 years ago Report Comment
Tacky.
Horrible.
Horrible.
- 4 years ago Report Comment
the stockings are ridiculous, but sasha grey looks hot as usual.
- 4 years ago Report Comment
agree w/ tlsgirl!
- 4 years ago Report Comment
agree w/ tlsgirl!
- 4 years ago Report Comment
Funny! I guess it's functional in some ways, but it's just not right.
- 4 years ago Report Comment
that's ridiculous, I guess there's also been some panties with this idea, or at least a "v-neck" at the back. All i can ask is what the hell? If you want so badly to show off your butt, don't wear anything. It's cheaper!
- 3 years ago Report Comment
I don't get what the point is. I would never wear these. I agree with #18. Garter belt and thigh-highs are much more realistic.

Post A Comment

To post comments, please log in or register.