Do Tell: Have You Ever Been With an Uncircumcised Man?

August 13, 2008

The jury is still out when it comes to circumcising your kids, but when you meet a man as an adult, that decision was already made for him long ago. While circumcision is done for several reasons — so sons can look like their fathers, for religious purposes, or for cleanliness — medical research still wavers as to what's better. Since many are opting against it, do tell, have you ever been with an uncircumcised man? If so, was it any different from being with a man who was circumcised?

202 Comments

fresh88 1 year

@Anonymous does he take antideppressants? they tend to do that

2 years

The special of uncircumcised is it have a natural lube under the foreskin, which give more pleasure for the man.... but for circumcised, it just longer lasting for sexual intercourse.... and also easy to clean it....

2 years

My aunt is an M.D. (Obstetrics) and she and I have discussed this subject. Her opinion is that males should be circed for the safety of both men and women. She has circed countless males and said that if done properly,it is almost painless. She contends that a lose circ is as bad as no circ because there is still lose skin to collect bacteria. She tries to leave only a small amount of skin so as to not have too tight of an erection. She has shown me facts that many women have developed cancer of the cervix from uncut men,so we both belive that removing the foreskin from males is a small price to pay for eliminating this type of cancer. All boys in my family are and will be circumcised.

2 years

Coming from the gay community here in the US, uncut d*cks are the best. Way easier to get off and way more fun to play with. I swear to god it takes forever to get any of my previous cut partners off regardless of what I would do. Always ended up with a hand of dried KY which is all sticky and nasty, whereas the uncut guys I could get off without lube and the foreskin was always fun to play with. I've never been with someone who wasn't clean and before any sex play we would take a shower together. It was hot and we were both clean and ready to go. Two birds with one stone! My current bf of 3 years now is unaltered and I love him dearly. He talked about being circ'd to fit in, but after seeing how many athletes and celebrities (gay porn stars especially!) were uncut he quickly changed his mind. And ladies, if you have an issue with uncut penises because they look "weird/funny" or because of hygiene, maybe you should take look in a mirror and see how joyful a vagina really looks and see how it sells before you jump in the shower. I betcha it doesn't smell like sugar, spice and everything nice, girl! haha A shower a day keeps the odor away! (For both sexes)

2 years

Wow, that is one of the most ignorant comments I've ever read. Especially re the umbilical cord... great addition to the conversation. ANYWAY, this isn't about what is better. It's a discussion about what women or men prefer and personal experiences. I've been with both and agree with all the comments about the uncut sex being more sensual. Sex with an uncut man has been so much better for me and that's all I gotta say!

2 years

Well it is interesting to see the various opinions of all you girls. Here's what I know - I am not circumsized. I have been told that I am much more "intense". We are more sensitive, although I can only go by what I've heard. I believe we enjoy sex much more. As far as hygiene goes, that goes both ways, and you could consider it an indicator which you might not otherwise have....Also, there have been some things in the news that uncircumsized men carry more diseases - this is ridiculous, and overlooks the fact that a guy would have to catch something from someone else first.... Personally I like the way I am and have never had any complaints, in fact only compliments. I think it's barbaric and archaic. Have fun girls xx

2 years

Clearly all the pro-weiner-hooding girls on here are guys posting to make themselves and other uncut freaks feel better. Every girl knows that cut is better and not disgusting like the cream cheese stinky hooded turtle faced weiner freaks. I susspose cutting an imbelicle cord is cruel too! lmao! And women shaving their legs is unnatural, thats about the strength of the pro hooded monster wiener guys. Unless you live in australia with a bunch of other idiots I recommend you follow common sense health practices like preventing yourself from being a sexual outcast.

2 years

and another thing.... mutilated guys do not know how to masturbate an intact guy; they don't realize the glans of the intact guy is much more sensitive and fragile as theirs....wrong; i have had abrasions (rugburn-type) from guys who gave me a handjob like they do their own.

Jake2010 2 years

Really? I can't believe all the traffic on this....

2 years

My most recent lover was uncircumcised and I must say the sex with him seemed more passionate. He seemed to feel any and every thing. When I first saw it I wasn't sure if something was wrong because the thought of being uncircumcised seemed out Of the ordinary but now I think I prefer them uncircumcised especially since I learned that it IS more sensitive!

2 years

as far as sex goes i cant really tell the difference. When it comes to oral as long as its clean i prefer uncircumcised...idk why

2 years

My husband is circumcised. He did it for me. I totally like it because it looks great and is so clean. I´m also circumcised. My clitoris is unhooded, all skins removed, which I think is pretty similar as male circumcision. The clit has become dry afterwards and now has no smelling at all and a great sensitivity because totally exposed.

2 years

I prefer circumcised women, That nasty smegma they get is really gross blegh! s'like a cottage cheese n fish factory! I was with an uncircumcised woman once, never again. Just thinking about how if they don't wash they get nasty is enough to make me lose my boner. That clitoris, sure it makes women more sensitive and have more fun during sex. but i don't care it just looks unsettling to me. like a little penis! Just lob it off i say, that way she doesn't have to worry about cleaning the hood. plus it looks better. I hear that Americans don't cut their daughters. strange. Glad to be in Africa where we're a bit more civilized! To each their own though :)

2 years

I've only been with circumcised, but I feel bad that he was put through that when he was just a tiny newborn. A lot of times the only thing they're given is a pacifier with sugar water and tylenol following the procedure. And, you know, a lot of cultures who practice female genital mutilation do it because they believe it's more "hygienic" and "aesthetic." Maybe even because of tradition and because it will make them look like their mothers.

2 years

The comments on here make Americans look shallow and ignorant. I know enough Americans not to believe that. I'm British so most of the men I know are whole. I'm quite unusual that my partner is circumcised but that is due to a genetic condition (which I won't go into and yes, they did try other things first and no, you won't have heard of it so don't try to become the expert). Sex is a lot about the man, however I do notice a difference. As a British mother I can NOT get my head around mutilating babies. American men aren't the best lovers, the cleanest men, the least likely to have STDs in the world. As far as how good they are at sex and how clean they are, who's to say, but the USA has one of the worst STD rates, so definitely not! The NHS is not groaning with the pressure of whole men suffering from all the complications you seem to think come from being whole. Our care homes don't have problems caring for whole men, they just, ya know, leave it alone! I have not heard one argument for circumcision that is not flawed, ignorant, arrogant or Amercentric.

2 years

i've been with 2 cut guys and one intact-my hubby is intact-thank goodness! i love it, MUCH prefer it and it feels much better. no cleanliness issues here and i like the natural penis better by far. we did not cut our son-makes me want to puke just thinking about it. this topic makes me curious about how men feel about vaginas-we all know about their reputation. not cleaning a intact penis would be the same as not cleaning a vagina and who doesn't clean their vagina?? exactly. what i mean is who wants to be with someone who doesn't clean themselves intact or not?

2 years

I am a virgin and refuse to sleep with a mutilated man or any man who supports mutilation. I'm a virgin because I live in the U.S. where every man is mutilated and virtually every man supports it.

Lippy Girl 2 years

Circumcised men have a better, richer sensual experience - especially in sex play and oral (if you find it difficult with an uncut man Silver you're doing it wrong!). Their skin makes entry gentle and sex more lubricated - it also rubs on your g-spot in a way which is deliciously pleasurable for both of you. Hands free orgasms much more likely - including simultaneous! And after sex it gets put away in its special pouch, to keep safe for next time (as you would with any other highly engineered bit of kit). It's cleaner than your bits too.What's not to like?I'm disturbed at some of the ignorance and misandry on her. For the record you girls are 10 x more likely to get smegma than a man - you are also more likely to have a smelly bacterial or yeast infection! And a circ'd man is NOT safe from infections or smegma - circ'd men have double the chance of urethritis. If they have thrush they are less likely to realise it and so less likely to get treatment...not a good thing.They are also more likely to refuse condoms - because the desensitisation compounds their exisiting desensitisation. Forced male circ is just as much of a human rights violation as forced female circ - and no one should be trying to sugar coat it. Female circ for the record very rarely involves stitching her up - and often just involves slitting or removing her foreskin. So really not as different as you think.

Lippy Girl 2 years

Circumcised men have a better, richer sensual experience - especially in sex play and oral (if you find it difficult with an uncut man Silver you're doing it wrong!). Their skin makes entry gentle and sex more lubricated - it also rubs on your g-spot in a way which is deliciously pleasurable for both of you. Hands free orgasms much more likely - including simultaneous! And after sex it gets put away in its special pouch, to keep safe for next time (as you would with any other highly engineered bit of kit). It's cleaner than your bits too. What's not to like? I'm disturbed at some of the ignorance and misandry on her. For the record you girls are 10 x more likely to get smegma than a man - you are also more likely to have a smelly bacterial or yeast infection! And a circ'd man is NOT safe from infections or smegma - circ'd men have double the chance of urethritis. If they have thrush they are less likely to realise it and so less likely to get treatment...not a good thing. They are also more likely to refuse condoms - because the desensitisation compounds their exisiting desensitisation. Forced male circ is just as much of a human rights violation as forced female circ - and no one should be trying to sugar coat it. Female circ for the record very rarely involves stitching her up - and often just involves slitting or removing her foreskin. So really not as different as you think.

2 years

"...medical research still wavers as to what's better." Only USA research wavers. The rest of the world is not convinced that routine circumcision is a good idea. USA research also turns a blind eye to the possibility that circ is sexually damaging especially in later life. American sex research is also blind to the sexual advantages of having all the moving parts. American researchers are either circumcised themselves, or are married to circumcised husbands, and this makes for a huge blind spot. Let me share a little secret. American gay men value intact partners a lot. A lot of porn for gay men is foreskin focussed. I submit that gay men know a fair bit about comparing johnsons. Another thing: only 2 western nations still snip their men. One is South Korea, which does it mostly when boys are in middle or high school. And the other is the good ol' US of A, the land of the bald eagle... and the bald penis.

2 years

It is very true that if he's uncut and hard, he pretty much looks cut, unless you look at him very closely under a good light. The main way the foreskin betrays itself is when you play with johnson with your hands, the uncut guys have more give in the skin system. To make a big deal of about what an uncut guy looks like is to make a big deal of about the limp dick, which is not the sort of dick we ladies are supposed to be interacting with. #169: the female analogue to male circ is not cutting off the labia majora, which would be very difficult and a bloody mess. The strict analog to male circ would be cutting off the hood covering the tip of the clitoris. Over the past 40 years, some women have elected to do this as cosmetic surgery. Gals, if you can unhood your clit, and doing so gives you a thrill, then you are experiencing the pleasure an uncut guy feels when he moves his foreskin back and forth. You have a better idea of what it means to have foreskin than a cut guy has. Another analog to male circ would be cutting off the inner lips. The inner lips cover the place where we pee and screw, which is what the male foreskin does for men. The inner lips facilitate intercourse, but are not essential. They can trap smell and secretions in a gross way, but clean between them is not hard. There are gals who ask cosmetic surgeons to make their lips smaller, just as there are guys who are ashamed of having foreskin. Both are silly, BTW. I like how the American black woman Twanna Hines writes about the uncut johnsons of her European boyfriends.

2 years

The first time you are with a dude, you have the right to inspect him closely. If he smells or has dick cheese under the hood, have him make a trip to the bath, then inspect him again. You always have the right to insist that intimacy begin with a shower together, and during that shower, you have the right to clean his tackle to your standard. If after all this, he doesn't get the hint and you find yourself losing your lunch with him, dump him. That said, we ladies do not have the right to demand that our bed partners be circumcised so as to avoid hygiene issues. Even more so, hygiene issues are not a reason for making a baby boy go through all the pain, and run the risk of sexual dysfunctionality in later life. Wash, don't amputate. Intact makes foreplay easier and oral less important, because fingers alone suffice to thrill him. Intact guys feel less of a need to engage in what is called "power f***ing." I hear that for some cut guys, the thrill of sex slowly goes away after they turn 40 or 50, and that this is likely to happen when a guy has all his moving parts. I have read some evolutionary biology, so that I prefer to give Mother Nature the benefit of the doubt. For a lot of you out there, intact means European or Latino. But in the future, more and more of our younger sisters will find that the trouser snakes of their boyfriends come with eyelids. Deal with it, gals!

2 years

Circumcised penises are ugly! They're all scarred up and dried out. I don't know how one can prefer them over natural, whole penises! My hubby is intact (he's no more uncircumcised than he is undecapitated) and sex has always been fantastic. And foreskin is fun to play with! I prefer an intact man. As far as hygiene: Females produce wayyy more smegma than males. How would you feel if a man thought an intact female was gross because of all the vaginal discharge? How shallow and immature!

2 years

Unfortunately, I've not had the pleasure of an intact penis. My husband and I both are sad that he had that part of his body amputated when he was born. At least our sons have all their body parts.

2 years

My husband is uncirc'd and I'd not have it any other way. Most of my previous partners were circ'd and my husband - by FAR - has the best stamina and sexual response of all of them. As for oral sex, it's really no different. In fact, once aroused, it's very hard to tell that he's intact becasue the foreskin expands to acommodate the enlargement - that's part of it's purpose as intended by nature. As long as a shower is a daily thing, or even every other day, cleanliness is a non-issue. Do you wash under your eyelids every day? Same thing. People need to get real about circumcision: it is a needless and torturous cosmetic surgery performed on the genitals of infants who can neither consent to the proceedure or defend themselves from it. I could never derive a preference for the state of a man's penis being cut knowing what he endured as a baby to achieve it. Search "Penn and Teller Circumcision" on YouTube.com for a very real, yet humor-laced look at this practice. PS - recent research that reported "health bennefits" of circumcision were totally bogus, conducted in third world nations and has been fully deunked.

Link Love

202 Comments